Trackademia

Academic comparisons,
in context.

Trackademia is a database of academics, and the comparisons built on it, for universities.

Understand a department alongside its peers. Compare academics within their own field and career stage. Follow each fact back to its source.

The product is live privately, behind sign-in.

Where you sit

Fictional department · Larkspur University

4th of 29 (top 14%)

One highlighted fictional academic

29 fictional colleagues on a logarithmic citation axis. The highlighted dot is fourth highest; the median is marked.
Illustration with made-up data. Each dot is one colleague. Positions describe this fictional comparison only.

A different question
at every level.

Analytics gives academics, chairs, deans and institutional research staff a defined basis for comparison.

Department chairs

How does my department compare with the same department elsewhere?

Compare people within their field and career stage.

Deans and provosts

Which departments are strong within their fields, and how do we compare with peers?

The Dean view compares each selected department with the same discipline elsewhere, without adding departments together.

Institutional research

What is counted, where did it come from, and what is missing?

Examine the method

Individual academics

Where do I sit in my department, and in my field at my career stage?

Fixed comparisons, with one definition per figure.

A defined starting point.

Data as of October 10, 2026

5universities
53departments
10fields
4,538academics

Current coverage

Stanford, Dartmouth, Chicago, Harvard and Princeton.

These are institutions represented in the database, not customers, partners or endorsements.

Within the database

About 1,730 tenured or tenure-line faculty with citation data. About 26,600 journals and other publication venues.

Fields: political science, economics, English, chemistry, biology, psychology, philosophy, computer science, sociology, history.

The other 9 Ivy Plus universities come next.

Evidence you can
trace.

Start with the department directory

AI research agents read official department directories and people’s public pages. Code checks their answers, and every fact keeps its source.

Keep the gaps visible

Missing information is shown as missing, never as zero. Citation figures need context and must never be the sole basis of a personnel decision.

Read about trust and security

Your institution’s CVs.
Your institution’s view.

My Institution extracts appointments, degrees, honors and publications from faculty CVs sent privately by your university. Each record keeps the CV passage it came from.

Explore My Institution

Private records, kept separate

Each institution sees only its own data. The database itself enforces that separation.

In development

Linking private CV records to the public data is in development.

Start with your institution’s questions.

Access is private. Every account is approved individually.

Request access